Thursday, September 3, 2020

Modernism, Mass Culture

Andrea Hussies contends that â€Å"since the shape nineteenth century, the way of life of innovation has been portrayed by an unpredictable connection between high workmanship and mass culture. † The essayist expresses that Modernist craftsmen endeavored to remove themselves from the â€Å"lark pour lark† developments of the turn of the century like Art Nouveau, Symbolism and ?aestheticism. This kind of workmanship pandered to the flavors of the white collar classes endeavoring to live â€Å"the great life† which developed into a culture of wantonness and guilty pleasure. TheModernists likewise removed themselves from Abstract Expressionism during the Post World War II years, preferring self-rule, an antagonistic vibe toward mass culture and a â€Å"radical partition from the way of life of ordinary life† as opposed to a craving to â€Å"find a substance rich with significance and aromatic of social obligation. † Hussies features that the most notew orthy Modernist â€Å"attack† on the feel thoughts of the independence of high culture In the nineteenth century came about because of a conflict of the autonomous pioneer stretch riches the post World War I progressive legislative issues in Russia andGermany, and the Increasingly fast advancement of city life during the mid twentieth century. Hussies states that the assault was known as the verifiable avian nursery representing another style approach, showed in developments like expressionism, Berlin Dada, Russian constructivism, the post Russian Revolution deliberate and French Surrealism. The writer attributes this nearness to a purported â€Å"Great Divide† isolating high craftsmanship from mass culture, which he demands is basic to the hypothetical and recorded comprehension of modernism.The book Fin De Isâ ©clue and Its Legacy expresses that Hussein's postulation about postmodernist is profoundly disputable, and that creative innovation must be comprehended comp arable to the improvements that came after the development of new mass interchanges advances from the hour of Baudelaire to the Second World War. In spite of an extraordinary partition, the improvements of high workmanship clearly came to fruition as a response to and reliance on mass interchanges advancements. One may contend that aesthetic innovation must be comprehended corresponding to the mass culture of the time.Hussies affirms that both innovation and the avian-garden have consistently characterized their personality comparable to conventional middle class high culture and present day business mass culture. He accepts that most conversations identifying with innovation, the avian-garden and even post innovation approve common high culture to the detriment of the avian-nursery or innovation. Specialists of the mid nineteenth century like French Realist Gustavo Courier opposed the portrayal of recorded and anecdotal subjects in craftsmanship, liking to concentrate their work on commonplace regular contemporary life.Through his work, Courier split away from scholarly structures and gauges that pushed Idealism, and endeavored to destabilize the financial force structure of the day. Despite the fact that It may create the impression that there were reason for needing to isolate the idea of high craftsmanship from mass culture, the financial atmosphere in France cash of mass correspondence so as to get by. Craftsmen like Henry Toulouse-Ululate and Eggâ ©nee Grasses depended on banner creation as a methods for creating income.In the instance of Grasses, in the wake of examining craftsmanship and engineering and functioning as a practiced painter and stone worker, he planned and delivered banners, which was said to have become his fortâ ©. His banners in the long run created enthusiasm for the United States, and the craftsman was approached to structure a spread for Harpers magazine in 1892 during a period of proceeding with development in the magazine busine ss. One may propose that rather than there being an incredible partition between high workmanship and mass culture, specialists of the time were utilizing the instruments of high craftsmanship to impart thoughts to mass culture, and that each existed couple with rather than contrary to the other.Hussies contends that both Greenberg and Adorn demanded a â€Å"categorical division of high craftsmanship and mass culture†, the two men being driven by a motivation to â€Å"save the nobility and self-rule of the fine art from the extremist weights of fundamentalist mass displays, communist authenticity and debased business mass culture in the West. † However, the essayist goes on to pleasantly propose that albeit the two men's driving forces may have been right at that point, their request of such a partition or separation got out dated.

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

The Negative Effects of Child Abuse and Neglect Essay -- Consequences

Youngsters are beaten until their bodies do not recuperate anymore, they are singed with bubbling water, they are famished thus got dried out that their skin shrinks around their delicate bones, they are explicitly attacked and compelled to play out a wide range of distorted acts, and they are secured storage rooms or attached to bed posts for quite a long time (Koster and Swisher). In the time of 2012, multiple youngsters daily were killed because of kid misuse, and the number is by all accounts consistently rising (Child Abuse Statistics and Facts). Kid misuse is a terrible wrongdoing that hurts a significant number of the kids in today’s society. One issue with this wrongdoing is that it is a quiet wrongdoing, one that regularly occurs in the protection of a family’s home. It is dismal truth that, because of the wrongdoing being covered up, kids in the public eye endure peacefully, and not all culprits get captured for their wrongdoing. Be that as it may, individuals should know about the issue, since kid misuse has unfavorable mental and social impacts. Despite the fact that youngster misuse has unfriendly mental and social impacts, to see how these impacts happen, one would need to comprehend what kid misuse is. Kid misuse is a demonstration â€Å"carried out by a child’s guardian or permitted to occur, that outcomes in a scope of wounds running from death, to genuine debilitating injury, to enthusiastic misery, to ailing health and illness† (Gelles 14). All these various types of wounds are what cause youngsters to have mental and social issues. Specialists, therapists, and legitimate framework all have various understandings to what characterizes youngster misuse. There are fluctuating types of the definition, however the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act characterizes kid maltreatment as, â€Å"The physical and mental injury, se... ..., Jacquelyn Quiram, and Nancy R. Jacobs, ed. Kid Abuse: Betraying a Trust. Wylie,TX: Information Plus, 1995. Lowry, Laura. Individual meeting. 8 Nov. 2002. Mammen, Oommen K., David J. Kolko, and Paul A. Pilkonis. â€Å"Negative Affect and Parental Aggression in Child Physical Abuse.† Child Abuse and Neglect 26 (2002): 407-424. Scholastic Search Premier. EBSCO. Roesch Library, Dayton. 17 Oct. 2002 . Mitchell, Brandon J.A. Individual meeting. 8 May 2015. Veltman, Marijcke W. M., and Kevin D. Browne. â€Å"Three Decades of Child Maltreatment Research: Implications for the School Years.† Trauma, Violence and Abuse 2 (2001): 215-239. Scholastic Premier Search. EBSCO. Roesch Library, Dayton. 18 Nov. 2002 . Kid Abuse Statistics and Facts ChildHelp Web. 3 June 2015. misuse insights/

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Quoting - Paraphrasing - and Summarizing

Question: Examine about the Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing. Answer: Presentation: The story I chose is How Did I Get Here Bruce by Stefanie Freele. The creator describes about existence nearby focusing on a character named Bruce. Bruce is an apparently tranquil individual who minds his own business perusing and composing on his typewriter more often than not. No one appears to think a lot about Bruce, and everybody in the structure that they live seems to have their rendition of the story. At the point when individuals begin vanishing, Bruce is the principle suspect albeit nobody is certain that Bruce is answerable for the vanishing. This is until watches capture him toward the finish of the story. I enjoyed how the storyteller gives an away from of the manner in which they lived in a structure inside the grounds. In any case, what I despise is the degree of unreliability that the understudies in the structure had. The understudies survived their days drinking, sub par examining, smoking pot along the stream, wrestling in the slushy quad till were shrouded in mud on Saturday morning. (Freele, 2012). The understudies realized that individuals were vanishing from the structure by being tossed down the incinerator, yet nobody assumed responsibility for the circumstance or even attempted to raise an authority concern(Freele, 2012). They recently realized that in the long run, somebody would vanish down the chute, however who or when that happened didn't appear to trouble them. They realized that Bruce did it and notwithstanding this, they couldn't think of an away from of how sure they were it was him. It is because of their carelessness that they didn't have a clue, or even request to realize what Bruce was composing or even attempt to get him. References How Could I Get Here BruceStefanie FreeleFlash Fiction Online. (2017) Recovered 6 February 2017, from I-arrive bruce-stefanie-freele.html Purdue OWL: Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing. (2017) Recovered 6 February 2017, from

Product Mix and New Product Development Strategies Essay

The Coca-Cola versus Pepsi rivalry is maybe the most notable contention throughout the entire existence of advertising. Coke has since a long time ago appreciated the home field advantage, having gotten dug in as the most mainstream and recognizable cola all through the world. In spite of the fact that it has cut itself a considerable part of the market, Pepsi has battled to coordinate the business income of Coca-Cola; up to this point. In spite of the fact that Pepsi has never verged on rising to Coke cola piece of the overall industry, they have gotten more forceful and capable than Coke in cornering the non-carbonated drink showcase. It is in this market Pepsi is looking to acquire a feasible upper hand over Coke. It their mission to gain and grow new items, will the utilization of the PTSTP strategy assist Pepsi with growing new items so as to get a practical serious advantage?A item is characterized in three levels; center, real, and enlarged. The center of the item is the advantage it offers the shopper. For the case of colas, it could be refreshment, vitality (sugar and caffeine), sharpness, or just delight. The soft drink itself is the real item. The enlarged item for a cola could be the acknowledgment and status increases apparent by drinking that specific brand. Or on the other hand it could even be the weight reduction from adhering to abstain from food colas. For the improvement of new items, we first need to recognize what comprises of another item. There are six classes of new products:1.New-To-The-World. This is an item that has no like item offered somewhere else. For instance, when the primary PC was offered to people in general, this would be another item. 2.New Product Lines. This is when comparable items exist, conceivably considerably under a similar brand, yet another line of the item offers some unmistakable distinction to those items previously advertised. For instance, offering diet colas notwithstanding normal colas under a similar brand. 3.Product Line Additions. This is the expansion of an item that is straightforwardly identified with one advertised. For instance, offering Vanilla Coke available to be purchased close by Coke. 4.Improvements/Revisions. This is an item which has just been offered,â but some change or modification has been made to the items properties. For instance: New Coke, or anything named â€Å"new and improved.†5.Repositioned Products. A similar item offered in another market or coordinated towards another objective market. For instance Pepsi bringing Sabritas chips into the US to focus on the Hispanic market. 6.Lower-Priced Products. This is essentially diminishing the cost of a current item to animate deals. New items influence the item blend of an organization. Item blend is commonly characterized as â€Å"the all out composite of items offered by a specific organization.† The item blend incorporates both individual items and product offerings. A product offering is a gathering of items which are firmly related by work, client base, conveyance, or value extend. To utilize Pepsi for instance, Pepsi’s item blend incorporates refreshments and potato chips. The refreshment product offering comprises of carbonated, non-carbonated, and water. Pepsi, Gatorade, and Aquafina all are singular items. PTSTP is a memory helper for the five stage process basic Target Marketing and Positioning. The five stages are as follows:1.Identify serious Products. 2.Define the Target showcase. 3.Determine the reason for Segmentation. 4.Determine if any Target markets are underserved. 5.Develop a Product for the underserved showcase. By utilizing this strategy, an organization can distinguish a hole in a specific market fragment. This hole might be available in light of the fact that there is no item to fill it, or on the grounds that the present item is arriving at an amazing finish cycle, accordingly making an open door for new development. To respond to the past inquiry, we will differentiate the PTSTP strategy to Coca-Cola and Pespi’s improvement of the non-carbonated refreshment advertise. Pepsi has ceaselessly battled to coordinate Coke’s piece of the overall industry in colas and other carbonated drinks. Coke appreciates a 44% cut of the market contrasted with Pepsi’s 32%. During their multi year competition, Pepsi has never verged on selling as much soft drink as Coke. Quite a bit of this is expected to Coke’s brand acknowledgment. Despite the fact that in 2006 Pepsi, just because, beat Coke in refreshments sold. This was expected to Pepsi’s embracement of the non-carbonated refreshment showcase, where it drove the market with a 24% offer over Coke’s 16%. Pepsi had the option to perceive and exploit the developing non-carbonized showcase a lot sooner than Coca-Cola. In spite of the fact that cola deals have as of late deteriorated to under 1% development, non-carbonated drinks became 8% in 2004. A significant part of the disappointment of Coke to venture into this market can be followed back to the willfulness of Coke administrators to extend past the soft drink showcase. Coke had a chance to procure Quaker Oats in the 1990’s, yet passed on the chance. Rather, Pepsi gained Quaker Oats in 2001. Among Quaker Oats resources were Gatorade and Snapple, the two heads in their business sectors. In spite of the fact that these product offerings were at that point set up, they spoke to new items to Pepsi, as they spoke to Pepsi’s presentation into the non-carbonated refreshment advertise. Thus, Pepsi claims an instructing lead in the games drink advertise, with Gatorade holding a 80% offer to Coke’s Powerade at 15%. Until 2001, Coca-Cola had been hesitant to grasp new items. They were not ready to broaden their organization and take the risk in the non-carbonated market, until they saw the achievement Pepsi was having. Notwithstanding missing Quaker Oats, Coke lost an offering war for the Sobe line of upgraded juices, and their offer for the Planet Java line of espressos teas was not grasped by their free bottlers. Be that as it may, since 2000 Coke has been effectively looking for new items in this market, including the procurement of the fruitful Minute Maid juice line. The distinction in theory has had the effect for Pepsi. Actually, losing the cola wars may have been the best thing for Pepsi. This constrained Pepsi to look outside the soft drink domain so as to build benefits. As Pepsi’s CEO, Steven Reinemund accepts that his company’s development is because of their consistent journey for change, that â€Å"Innovation is the thing that purchasers areâ looking for, especially in the little, routine things of their life.† Pepsi’s eagerness to grasp new product offerings has given them the edge over Coke without precedent for history. Their contributions of Quaker Oats’ refreshments, Sobe, and Aquafina have all been firsts for a soft drink organization. Accordingly, they have picked up the brand acknowledgment over Coke’s resulting contributions, prompting an expanded piece of the pie. With the goal for Pepsi to keep up their upper hand over Coke, they have to follow the counsel of Reinemund, by staying creative. PTSTP can assist them with supporting this favorable position. By distinguishing potential markets, and creating items for these business sectors, they can keep on catching new pieces of the overall industry. The drink showcase is immersed with choices for the purchaser, with new items seeming regular. A large number of these items are minor departure from existing items. For instance, caffeinated drinks have gotten extremely well known in the previous not many years. Thus the market has gotten overflowed with choices. It will turn out to be progressively hard to present new items in this classification. By utilizing PTSTP, Pepsi can recognize another specialty in this market, or an alternate market to misuse. Utilizing the caffeinated drinks for instance, the contenders territory from Fuze, Red Bull, and numerous others. By characterizing the objective market, they can distinguish that similar socioeconomics both will in general purchase soft drinks and caffeinated drinks. Pepsi would then be able to portion the market into youthful guys (18-30). They at that point confirm that the objective market of joined soft drink caffeinated drinks is underserved. They at that point build up an item to serve this market. In this way Pepsi Max is conceived. By utilizing PTSTP, Pepsi has made another item in soft drink caffeinated drinks, Pepsi Max. It is this sort of inventiveness and development that is grasped by Reinemund, and will serve to maintain Pepsi with a supported upper hand over Coke. Just by utilizing a strategy, for example, PTSTP, can underserved markets be distinguished and misused. References 1. reference book/item mix2. Brady, Diane (). A Thousand and One Noshes: How Pepsi deftly adjusts items to changing shopper tastes. Business Week. 14 Jun 20043. Foust, Dean. Things Go Better With †¦ Juice: Coke’s new CEO should move rapidly to make up for lost time in noncarbonated beverages. Business Week. 17 May 20044. Brooker, Katrina. How Pepsi outgunned Coke: Losing the cola wars was the best thing that at any point happened to Pepsi †while Coke was observing, PEP assumed control over an a lot bigger market. FORTUNE 1 Feb 2006

Friday, August 21, 2020

Lapses and Collapses

Slips by and Collapses Slips by and Collapses Slips by and Collapses By Mark Nichol This post records and characterizes slip by and its group of related words that relate to a section of time or to falling. The words examined beneath all get eventually from the Latin action word labi, which means â€Å"fall,† â€Å"sink,† and â€Å"slip,† notwithstanding other related activities, by method of lapsus, which means â€Å"falling† or â€Å"slipping† (allegorically or actually) or â€Å"passage of time† (from the feeling of â€Å"gliding†). Slip by, as an action word, initially related simply to that last detect, yet it later applied also to something getting invalid or void and obtained the extra implications of â€Å"commit a sin† or â€Å"fail to hold strict faith.† As a thing, pass implies â€Å"decline† or â€Å"fall,† or â€Å"interval,† â€Å"interruption,† or â€Å"termination,† or it might allude to a misstep because of distraction or obliviousness, or to deserting one’s confidence. The descriptive structure is slipped by; the modifier labile once implied â€Å"prone to come up short or fall,† yet now it relates to precariousness or penchant to change. (The descriptor labial and different words relating to lips are irrelevant.) Labefaction, in the interim, is a once in a while utilized word meaning â€Å"downfall† or â€Å"overthrow† in the feeling of a debilitating of common request or good standards. At the point when time passes by, it is said to slip by. That word was one after another likewise a thing, yet pass has supplanted it. In philosophy, a few words with the root lapsarian relate to different convictions about the scriptural record of the fall of mankind as recounted in the tale of the Garden of Eden: postlapsarian (â€Å"after the fall†), prelapsarian (â€Å"before the fall†), sublapsarian (â€Å"under the fall,† which is additionally the interpretation of the equivalent infralapsarian), and superlapsarian (â€Å"above the fall†). The action word breakdown (actually, â€Å"fall together†) implies â€Å"fall† or â€Å"fall apart,† â€Å"break down† or â€Å"lose viability or significance,† or â€Å"fold down† or â€Å"give way† and as a thing alludes to any of these activities. Something that can be fell, for the most part constrained to the feeling of â€Å"fold down,† is collapsible, and that quality is called collapsibility. At the point when a body part falls or slips, it is said to prolapse (â€Å"fall forward†), and such an event is a prolapse. A backslide (â€Å"fall again†), in the mean time, is an occasion where manifestations of an illness that had subsided repeat, and the word additionally fills in as an action word. Magma is a surprising related; the word portraying magma, or liquid stone, after it has surfaced from underground (in its liquid state or after it has cooled and solidified) comes from lapsus by method of Italian. The descriptor lavalike alludes to something looking like the liquid state. Lapidary, alluding to cutting of diamonds and stones, is a random word got from lapis, the Latin word for â€Å"stone.† Need to improve your English in a short time a day? Get a membership and begin accepting our composing tips and activities day by day! Continue learning! Peruse the Vocabulary class, check our mainstream posts, or pick a related post below:When to use on and when to utilize inHang, Hung, Hanged13 Theatrical Terms in Popular Usage

Sunday, July 26, 2020

A Burton Jew Thanksgiving

A Burton Jew Thanksgiving So I live in Burton Conner, like some other people, but I happen to live on Burton 2, known primarily for being right below the Burton Third Bombers and for having the largest concentration of Kosher keeping Jews on one floor anywhere, or just the highest concentration of Jews in general, hence our being known as Burton Jew. One suite even has a Kosher oven and such. I am not Jewish. I’m from the Midwest- I had a Jewish neighbor. Once. And that pretty much constitutes the entirety of my previous exposure to Judaism prior to MIT. Consequently, it never even occurred to me that I’d be living with Kosher keeping people, much less on a floor with a lot of them. I didn’t even know what being Kosher entailed besides no bacon, which was pretty much all I needed to know to be convinced that I could never be a good Jew in the case I decided to spontaneously convert. (Lack of bacon creates a positive ? in the reaction of my becoming Jewish? Whoa, okay, it’s offish, I’ve had too much 5.112.) Why does this have anything to do with Thanksgiving? Well, okay, a few things you should know about Kosher, if you’re like me three months ago and know nothing about it: 1. Meat and dairy can’t be eaten together. 2. Oh, and on top of that, you can’t use the same utensils to cook the two, either. This isn’t a big deal in normal life- I mean, you just exercise a little more caution with what spoon you’re eating your cereal with in the morning and everyone’s happy. But let’s think about this. Every year, we have a Burton Jew Thanksgiving for the entire floor- turkey, stuffing, pumpkin pie, mashed potatoes, other dishes liable to clog your arteries… and half of these have to be Kosher. The result is a weekend extravaganza of musical ovens in which Kosher things (like Ida, the kosher turkey) are cooked in Kosher ovens while non-kosher things (like Colonel Fitzsimmons, our non-kosher turkey) are cooked in the other ovens on the floor. (Right, we have kitchens. I probably should have said that three paragraphs ago.) Musical ovens can be dangerous. But no worries, here at MIT we take safety first and everyone made it to dinner in one piece, with the notable exceptions of Ida and Colonel Fitzsimmons. And as the females of the floor nursed our food triplets (wow, no pun intended…) the dinner was deemed a success. Good food and good friends- there’s not much else to give thanks for. Happy Thanksgiving from MIT! Post Tagged #Burton-Conner House

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Ideology of Communism - Free Essay Example

The basic ideology of communism was popularized in the second half of the nineteenth century because of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, two German political and economic philosophers. The goal of communism, as they viewed it, is for the working class to take control of the rewards of their labor, for even distribution of wealth among the people, and to overthrow capitalism. So long as all citizens work to the best of their ability, all people will receive according to their need. However, it wasnt put into practice up until the Russian Revolution where the Soviet Union was born. The concept was shaky still since most used communism and socialism interchangeably because of their similarities. When discussing communism, it is most often related to a specific political party and achieving economic equality through total eradication of public property. These beliefs center around the idea that inequality within a society is the product of capitalism, therefore the purpose is to declare communal control of most major means of production and natural resources. Reaching mid twentieth century, the political power communism bared was beyond thought; many speculated that it would surpass democracy as the superior ideology, yet in 2018, two decades later, as little as five communist countries remain. These include: the Peoples Republic of China, the Republic of Cuba, the Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, and the Socialist Republi c of Vietnam. Considering there is no right way to rule a nation, the following are the reasons whether or not nations were successful in their upbringing, and accounts for different views considering the economic, social, and political stances that could put each of the five at an advantage, or completely opposite, a disadvantage. Although it is not to prevalent in todays society, communism has great advantages as long as it is conducted correctly. In a communist nation, ideally, everyone has equal opportunity. A world in which everyone receives the same chance as others to build a life for themselves; a world in which no one has a head start. Wealth, a large factor that separates individuals in a capitalistic nation, does not make a difference for every citizen has the same opportunity as the next in order to become extraordinary based on their efforts, talents, and gifts. No social class can be better than another because there is no social class system at all and no job is greater than another. Apart from that, health care, education, and employment become much more accessible to the common citizens through a country ran with communism. Because a communist infrastructure requires its citizens to contribute as much as they are able to, there is almost no unemployment. In some way or another, everybody is emp loyed. The product of increased employment is lower crime since the basic needs of life are provided. Compared to a capitalistic society, in communist nations every girl is given the same level of educational opportunity. Hence, the divide between classes becomes nonexistent. The logic behind this is that children who have the freedom to go to the school of their choice are less likely to drop out and join the working class at a young age. To their benefit, the residents can receive the medical attention they need, free of cost. Illness and disease are easily prevented thus the workforce is not losing members, and the working class can no longer use that to their advantage. Due to the public ownership of major businesses, communism does not allow business monopolies. Since the government allots the money to be spent for production costs, there is no business competition. Government control means manufacturers can produce a limited number of goods and cannot demand for higher prices. Despite its good intentions, a communistic society is not all rainbows, butterflies, and sunshine. Meanwhile it is great for the population to live under the same economic conditions and consistently receiving paycheck after paycheck, earning is limited, and communism often results in national poverty. The hard caps that are placed on the amount of income an individual can earn, make it difficult for people to continue innovating since they become complacent and have no incentives to work harder. They are aware that they need to reach the community demanded level of productivity but have no reason to go beyond the minimum requirement. Although its goal is to hold everyone in equality, it is too often that families end up struggling with poverty. On record, the structure is perfect; however, it is easy for government officials and politicians to manipulate and corrupt the compensation that the proletariat receive. A single politician can tweak the system to where they receive the mos t compensation and the rest receives less. Unfortunately, the lower class cannot question the integrity of the actions of their superiors and there is virtually no way for them to gain any insight regarding how the country they live in is ran. Thousands are kept in the dark. As in the most famous communistic nation, North Korea, people are kept in ignorance. There is rarely any type of contact outside of the country that is not screened by the government beforehand. Even though the population may believe that they are aware of current events, they are unaware of the true nature of the world for what the government considers beneficial to them. The most discouraging disadvantage of all is the lack of personal freedom that those inhabiting countries as the United States enjoy. The goal of communism is to have all individuals working toward the same goal, therefore people are not free to pursue their own interests. Additionally, freedom of speech is taken away meaning that if someone o penly criticizes the government, they are subjected to harsh punishment. The creative pursuits that many in democratic nations take for granted are not encouraged within a communistic world. Because those with passion for anything creative are not paid for it, the citizenry simply does not have incentive to partake in these outlets thus pushing arts aside as a whole. On paper, communism sounds very utopic; this system of government looks good because it focuses on equality and eliminating social classes that separate one another. If we take the time to study the many nations that have attempted to apply some of these qualities to their social, political, and economic value, it is true that some were successful in the beginning but ended up a step behind the rest of the world. Even today, countries that claimed to be once completely communistic are slowly changing their markets or converting to recognize private ownership. In my opinion, compared to capitalism, it does not stand a chance. However, what I consider might be more effective for the well-being of the entire population in socialism. Logistically speaking, a concept like this could never be implemented into any of the nations of today as it is no longer effective, and the disadvantages outweigh the good.