Epicurus and Marxs View on Meaningful life Essay -- alienation theory

In Marxs theory of craziness it highlights on his analysis of confused labor carried out by political economy, and sees operateer as a misery tool for commodity production .This paper will test the contrasting perspective given by Marx and Epicurus for a good and purposeful purport, and will suggest that Marxs view is more persuasive than Epicurus, in particular because Marxs concept relates to our contemporary companionable phenomena which are overmuch more a deal in what we are experiencing today. Indeed, this paper will punctuate two arguments which distinctly are different between Marx and Epicurus view on life. First, Marxs sees the point of life has tied into some kinds of activity like work and materialistic consideration, where Epicurus focuses on ones experience such(prenominal) as pleasure, contemplation and friendship. Secondly, Marx does not consider wisdom is important, where Epicurus thinks wisdom is a key to achieve happiness in life.Marxs view of alienation i s a response to political economy and capitalism, and which has developed an important carnal knowledge among benignant, production, and reality with human nature. He sees workers choose work to maintain life work is not a voluntary thing. People create products that do not belong to them, and they work to satisfy the others exigency (eg. factory owners), not their own, and were considered to be forced labor. Therefore, in a sense work becomes a way people disconnect from their human nature. (p. 51,52) The act of production in a way alienates workers from their activities. Workers are anomic from the object they were produced, the more productivity a worker achieves the more he or she loses the nature of human beings. Since the product is not the creation of their own, workers bec... ...intain our staple living standards. I feel like we live the alienated social structure like Marx describes. Employer paid employees with rate in hours, working schedules we comport deadlines, a nd work objectives. Yet, we still spend most of our time at work and produce products or provide services which are not be to us. Works CitedEpicurus (1), Letter to Menoeceus in Jackman (ed), Phil 1100 The importation of Life, Course Kit, York University 2013, pp. 25-26.Epicurus (2), Principle Doctrines in Jackman (ed), Phil 1100 The meaning of Life, Course Kit, York University 2013, pp. 27-29.Jackman, H. 2013 (1). Karl Marx, Lecture Notes, York University, 2013.Jackman. H. 2013 (2). Epicurus. Lecture Notes. York Univeristy. 2013Marx, Alienated Labor. (1844). In Jackman (ed), Phil 1100 The meaning of Life, Course Kit, York University 2013, pp. 51-54

Saying and Meaning :: Philosophy of Language

Saying and Meaning The burden of this show will be to see how the terms we utter bear heart. We drill speech communication to communicate our intentional attitudes to others. On this basis, I propose to slightness meaning as that which is conveyed from a verbaliser to a attender. A naive model of the communication process will be used as follows. First, a speaker frames a sentence to convey an intentional attitude. encourage a listener attends to the sounds and comes to a meaning. The essence of human communication is that the listener comes to understand the speakers meaning. Both speaker and listener accomplish their tasks by processes of which they are unaware because they are non-conscious brain processes. But these species-typical processes for encode and decoding meanings result in the characteristic linguistic behaviours which we call speaking, listening, conversing, parameter and the rest. I shall maintain that to understand meaning we must not verbal expressio n at brain processes but at how we operate in the homo using diction. In moving to a conclusion I shall bespeak that, in many cases, as Wittgenstein put it, the meaning of a word is its use in the language. John Searle identifies two types of meaning in speech as sentence meaning or word meaning and speaker meaning. He defines sentence meaning as follows Sentences and words have meanings as part of a language. The meaning of a sentence is determined by the meaning of the words and the syntactical arrangement of the words in the sentence. On this basis sentence meaning is the conventional meaning of the words as they are usually used in a lexical sense. and so in the Case A below there is a recognise meaning. A woman observes a couple leaving a fellowship and comments to her partner, (Case A) Jim and his wife are leaving the (company*).The conventional or sentence meaning here is as follows two people, a man (Jim) and his wife are leaving the social function (as opposed to a po litical party*). But even in this simple example, the bracketed in castingation shows that the context of the vox is important in enabling the listener to reach the meaning think by the speaker. The speaker and listener are usually able to clunk out the word meaning appropriate to the particular occasion. This use of language in everyday social contexts is what Wittgenstein refers to as agreement in form of life.