The Cloning Debate :: Cloning Argumentative Persuasive Argument

The Cloning Debate The first attempt in copy was conducted in 1952 on a group of frogs.The experiment was a partial success. The frog cells were cloned into otherliving frogs how eer, only one in every thousand developed unremarkably , all ofwhich were sterile. The rest of the frogs that survived grew to deviantly largesizes. In 1993, scientist and director of the in vitro lab at GeorgeWashington University, Jerry Hall and associate Robert Stillman, reported thefirst ever successful cloning of human embryos. It was the discovery of in-vitro fertilization in the 1940s that began the pursuit to ease the sufferingof infertile couples. After years of research, scientists learned that in atypical in-vitro procedure, doctors will insert terzetto to five embryos in hopesthat, at most, one or two will implant (Elmer-Dewitt 38). And that a cleaning ladywith only one embryo has about a 10% to 20% chance of getting pregnant throughin-vitro fertilization. If that embryo could be cloned and t urned into three orfour, thechances of a successful pregnancy would increase significantly(Elmer-Dewitt 38). The experiment the scientists performed is the equivalent of a motherproducing twins. The process has been practiced and almost perfected inlivestock for the past ten years, and some scientists believe that it seems onlylogical that it would be the next step in in-vitro fertilization. The procedurewas remarkably simple. Hall and Stillman selected embryos that were abnormalbecause they came from eggs that had been fertilized by more than one sperm(Elmer-Dewitt 38), because the embryos were defective, it would have beenimpossible for the scientist to actually clone another person. They did however,split the embryos into separate cells, as a topic creating separate andidentical clones. They began experimenting on seventeen of the defectiveembryos and when one of those single-celled embryos divided into two cellthescientists quickly separated the cells, creating two different em bryos with the very(prenominal) genetic information (Elmer-Dewitt 38). The cells are coated with aprotective covering called a zona pellucida, that is essential to development(Elmer-Dewitt 38), which was stripped away and replaced with a gel-like amount of money made from seaweed that Hall had been experimenting with. Thescientists were able to produce forty-eight clones, all of which died within sixdays. Other scientist have been quoted saying that although the experiment isfairly uncomplicated, it had not been well-tried before because of the moral andethical issues surrounding an experiment such as this one. Some people believethat aiding infertile couples is the only true benefit to cloning human embryos,